تصميم بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية وأثرها على تنمية التحصيل المعرفى بمقرر الحاسب وأمن البيانات ومهارات الفعالية الذاتية لدى طلاب معلم الحاسب الآلى

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلفون

قسم تکنولوجيا التعليم - کلية التربية النوعية - جامعة طنطا

المستخلص

يهدف البحث الحالى إلى تنمية التحصيل المعرفى بمقرر الحاسب وأمن البيانات ومهارات الفعالية الذاتية لدى طلاب معلم الحاسب الآلى، وذلک من خلال قياس أثر تصميم بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية، وتم تطبيق التجربة الأساسية على عينة تکونت من (60) طالب من طلاب الفرقة الثالثة شعبة معلم الحاسب الآلى بقسم تکنولوجيا التعليم فى الفصل الدراسى الثانى للعام الجامعى 2018/2019م بکلية التربية النوعية جامعة طنطا، وتم تقسيم الطلاب عشوائيا إلى مجموعتين وضمت کل مجموعة تجريبية (30) طالب، حيث قام طلاب المجموعتين التجريبيتين بالدراسة من خلال بيئة تعلم إلکترونية لتتضمن کل مجموعة نمط لتصميم الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية والتى تظهر بالترتيب: المجموعة التجريبية الأولى(بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية وفقا لنظرية الإستجابة للمفردة)، والمجموعة التجريبية الثانية(بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية وفقا لنظرية المناهج الدراسية)، وبعد تنفيذ التجربة تم حساب درجات الطلاب ومعالجة النتائج الإحصائية، والتى کشفت عن تفوق المجموعة التجريبية الثانية (بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية وفقا لنظرية المناهج الدراسية) فى التطبيق البعدى لکل من الإختبار التحصيلى المعرفى بمقرر الحاسب وأمن البيانات ومقياس الفعالية الذاتية، وعن وجود علاقة ارتباطية موجبة بين درجات طلاب المجموعتين التجريبيتين فى کل أدوات البحث، کما أکدت النتائج على تحقيق تصميم بيئة تعلم إلکترونية قائمة على نمط الإختبارات التکيفية البنائية نسبة کسب فى درجات طلاب المجموعتين التجريبيتين فى کل أدوات البحث وحققت المجموعة التجريبية الثانية أعلى معدل کسب.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية


أولا: المراجع العربیة:
1. حسن عوض الجندى (2014). الإحصاء والحاسب الآلى: تطبیقات IBM SPSS Statistics V21، مکتبة الأنجلو المصریة، القاهرة، الطبعة الأولى.
2. خالد یاسین الشیخ (2017). أمن نظم المعلومات والرقابة، دمشق، معضمیة الشام.
3. سراج الدین أحمد، خالد بن سلیمان (2018). قاموس مفردات أمن المعلومات، المملکة العربیة السعودیة، مرکز التمیز لأمن المعلومات.
4. فبرونیا القمص عبده سعد (2014). بناء موقع قائم على تکنولوجیات (ویب 2.0) لمقرر تشارکى فى أمن البیانات لتنمیة الجانب المعرفى والمهارى والتفکیر الناقد لدى طلاب شعبة معلم الحاسب، رسالة دکتوراه، قسم تکنولوجیا التعلیم، کلیة التربیة النوعیة، جامعة طنطا.

5. محمد عطیة خمیس (2019). المؤتمر العلمى السادس عشر للجمعیة العربیة لتکنولوجیات التربیة: التحول الرقمى قضایا ومشکلات التعلیم، کلیة الدراسات التربویة، جامعة القاهرة،2-4 یولیو.
6. مروة محمود سعد خلیفة(2017). تصمیم برنامج تعلم متنقل قائم على النظریة التواصلیة لتنمیة الکفاءة الذاتیة والأداء المهارى فى مقرر" الشبکات وأمن المعلومات" لدى طلاب المعاهد العلیا للحاسبات والمعلومات، رسالة دکتوراه، قسم تکنولوجیا التعلیم، کلیة التربیة، جامعة المنصورة.
7. نسرین محمد یسرى حشیش(2018). برنامج تعلیمى قائم على الویب لتنمیة بعض مهارات وقیم الإستخدام الآمن لتکنولوجیا المعلومات لدى تلامیذ الصف السادس الإبتدائى، رسالة ماجستیر، قسم مناهج وطرق تدریس تکنولوجیا التعلیم، کلیة التربیة، جامعة عین شمس.
ثانیا: المراجع الأجنبیة:
1. Aloia & Vaporicyan(2019).E-Learning Trends and How to Apply Them to Thoracic Sugery Education, Thoracic Surgery Clinics, Vol.29(3), 285-290.
2. Almasizadeh & Azgomi(2014).Mean Privacy: A Metric for Security of Computer Systems, Computer Communications, Vol.52(1), 47-59.
3. Anton, Mizota & Limsina(2019). Attentional Selectivily, Automaticity ans Self-Efficacy Predict Simulator-Acquired Skill Transfer to the Clinical Environment, The American Journal of Surgery, Vol.217(2), 266-271.
4. Aparicio, Bacoo & Oliveira(2017). Grit in the Path of E-Learning Success, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.66, 388-395.
5. Bai, Wang, Lo,Liu & Zhang(2019). Adaptive Bayesian Group Testing: Algorithms and Performance, Signal Processing, Vol.156, 191-207.
6. Baki & Winkley(2018).Adaptive Tests for Large Scale Formative Assessment, Engineering Education Learning, Vol.16(5), 1-30.
7. Barners(2019). E-CAT for Effective Learning and Students’ Skills, Cognitive and Educational Psychology, Vol.22(3), 66-92.
8. Barrada & Olea (2017). Controlling Item Exposure in Electronic Adaptive Testing, Psicothema, Vol.25(4), 156-159.
9. Bender & Ingram(2018).Connecting Attachment Style to Resilience: Contributions of SelfCare and Self-Efficacy, Personality & Individual Differences, Vol.130(1), 18-20.
10. Boulton, McDonald & Davis(2018).E-Learning and Nursing Assessment Skills and Knowledge-An Integrative Review, Nurse Education Today, Vol.66, 166-174.
11. Carlozz, Kallen, Lami, Hahn & Sander(2019). The Development of a New Computer-Adaptive Test to Evaluate Strain in Caregivers of Individuals with TBI: TBI-CarQol Caregiver Strain, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.100(4), 13-21.
12. Cassidy, Hogg, Berman & Field(2017). Developing Self-Efficacy Scale for Students in Salford University, Radiologic Technology, Vol.70(1).
13. Chaim, Pasiphol & Kanjanawasee (2017).Computerized Adaptive Testing with Reflective Feedback: A Conceptual Framework, Vol.217(5), 806-812.
14. Chalmers(2016).Generating Adaptive and Non- adaptive Tests Interfaces for Multidimensional Item Response Theory Applications, Journal of Statistical Software, Vol.71(5), 1-50.
15. Chang (2015).Sequential Design for Computerized Adaptive Testing for Developing Students Efficacy, Journal of Educational Research, Vol.56(3), 315-332.
16. Chen (2016).A Model for Effective Online Instructional Design, Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), Vol.6(2).
17. Chhetri(2017).E-Learning in Neurology Education: Principles, Opportunities and Challenges in Combating Neurophobia, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol.44, 80-83.
18. Chiang, Lu, Yu, Hsueh & Hsieh(2018).Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test in Patients with Stroke, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.99(8), 1499-1506.
19. Choi & King (2015).Multidimentional Adaptive Testing, Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(5), 333-341.
20. Cidral, Oliveria, Felice & Aparicio (2018). E-Learning Success Determinants: Brazilian Empirical Study, Computers & Education, Vol.122, 273-290.
21. Cobb, Sudar, Reiter, Anderson & Kohno(2018).Computer Security for data Collection Technologies, Development Engineering, Vol.3, 1-11.
22. Cooke & Vilata(2016).Adaptive Tests Models, Fast Numerical Expression Evaluator for NumPy, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, Vol.22, 17-53.
23. Diaz & Guitron (2017).Computer Adaptive Testing Design Models, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol(8), 7-15.
24. Elgharbawy, Scherhaufer, Oberho;;enzer, Frey & Gauterin (2019). Adaptive Functional Testing for Autonomous Trucks, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol.8(2), 202-218.
25. Farhan, Razmak, Demers & Lalamme(2019).E-Learning Systems Versus Instructional Communication Tools: Developing and Testing a New E-Learning User Interface from the Perspectives of Teachers and Students, Technology in Society Journal, 101-192.
26. Fennelly(2017).Effective Physical Security, Elsevier, 5th edition, 1-50.
27. Gibbons, kupfer, Frank, Lahey & Brent (2019). Computerized Adaptive Tests for Rapid and Accurate Assessment of Psychopathology Dimensions in Youth, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1-20.
28. Goggins (2018).CAT Theory and Practice for Improving Students Learning, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol.14(1), 4-58.
29. Gomez, Laria & Hernandez (2019).Computerized Adaptive Test and Decision Trees: A Unifying Research, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.117, 358-366.
30. Gosian & Arora(2015). Security Issues in Data Warehouse: A Systematic Review, Procedia Computer Science, Vol.48, 149-157.
31. Grimes(2016). Hacking the Hacker, Wiley, Info World, 1-50.
32. Harrison, Kennan, Howell & Greene (2017).Utilization of CAT for Developing Students Efficacy, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol.4, 304-317.
33. Hooman, Ghiyasvandian, Houser, Zakerimghadam & Torabi(2017). Effect of a Clinical Skills Refresher Course on the Clinical Performance, Anxiety and Self-Efficacy of the Final Year Undergraduate, Nurse Education in Practice, Vol.27, 151-156.
34. Hoshino & Cowell (2017).Comparison between E-Adaptive Testing Testing Models, Extensions and Applications, 295-312.
35. Huang, Tung, Chou, Wu & Hsieh(2018).Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test of Children’s Gross Motor Skills, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.99(3), 512-520.
36. Jahanshir, Tabari & Akbari(2015).Academic Self-Efficacy: Predictive Role of Attachment Styles and Meta-Cognitive Skills, Social and Behavioral Sciences,Vol.171(16), 113-120.
37. Jones (2014).E-Adaptive Tests Attitude Measurement Using the Rating Scale Model, The Journal of technology Learning and Assessment, Vol.12(8), 1-20.
38. Jouanjus, Mestre, Nodot, Rossin & Dupouy(2019).Teaching Basic Knowledge on Substance Use Disorders: The Impact of E-Leaning on Health Professionals, Clinical Therapeutics, 105-126.
39. Lai, Jennifer, Beaumant, Cindy, Nowinski, Cella & Goldman (2017).Computerized Adaptive Testing in Pediatric Brain Tumor Clincics, Journal of Pain and Symptorn Management, Vol.54(3), 289-297.
40. Lau, Lam, Kam, Nkhoma & Thomas (2018). The Role of Textbox Learning Resources in E-Learning: A Taxonomic Study, Computers & Education, Vol.118, 10-24.
41. Leighton (2018).Development Self-Control and Motivations Using CAT Tests, Statistical Theories of mental test Scores, 395-479.
42. Levinson & Huang (2015).Item Response Theory VS. Curriculum Theory in Computer Adaptive Assessments, Journal of Applied Measurement, Vol.8, 25-47.
43. Likova & Dalton (2018). Next Generation of Assessments: Electronic Adaptive Tests, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol.9, 287-304.
44. Lin, Huang, Lee, Huang& Hsieh(2018). Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System of the Functional Assessment of Stroke, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.99(4), 676-683.
45. Lin, Huang, Lee, Chieh & Hsieh(2019).Development of a Computerized Adaptive Testing System for Assessing5 Functions in Patients with Stroke: A Simulation and Validation Study, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol.100(5), 899-907.
46. Lorente & Salanova (2017).Developing Self-Efficacy among Construction Workers, International Journal of Psychology, Vol.30(2), 149-160.
47. Lu, Hu, Gao & Kinshuk(2016).The Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy, Training Satisfaction and Test Anxiety on attitude and Performance in Computerized Adaptive Testing, Computers & Education, 45-55.

48. Ludwig (2017).The Giant Black Book of Computer Viruses, American Eagle, 1-100.
49. Ma, Wu & Chen (2018).Diversity Driven Adaptive Test Generation for Concurrent Data Structures, Information and Software Technology, Vol.103, 162-173.
50. Maravic, Cisar & Pinter(2016). Evaluation of Knowledge in Object Oriented Programming Course with Computer Adaptive Tests, Computers & Education,Vol.92-93, 142-160.
51. Martin & Magis (2019).Adaptive Test System Supporting Versatile Educational Assessment, Computer & Educational, Vol.63(2), 325-357.
52. Martin, Malmberg, Kennett, Mansour & Pearson(2019). What Happens When Students Reflect on their Self-Efficacy during A Test? Exploring Test Experience and TestOutcome in Science, Learning and Individual Differences, Vol.73, 59-66.
53. Matthew, Savage, Robert & Tokunaga(2017). Moving Toward a Theory: Testing an Integrated model of Cyberbullying Perpetration, Aggression, Social and Internet Self-Efficacy, Computers in human Behavior, Vol.(71), 353-361.
54. Mazuela(2018). Maximum Information Stratification Method for E-Adaptive Tests, Journal of Statistical Software, 48(8), 1-32.
55. Mehta, Morris, Swinnerton & Homer (2019). The Influence of Values on E-Learning Adoption, Computers & Education, Vol.141, 103-117.
56. Meneghetti & Junior(2018).Application and Simulation of Computerized Adaptive Tests Through the Package Castim, Avaliable at: http://www.assess.com/castim, 1-21.
57. Mills(2017).Practical Issues in Large- Scale Computer Adaptive Testing, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol.15, 287-381.
58. Mitnik(2016).Ghost in the Wires: My Adventures as the World’s Most Wanted Hacker, American Eagle, 1-150.
59. Nadkarni(2016).Computer Security, Data Protection, and Privacy Issues, Clinical Research Computing, 143-158.
60. Nakakita & Uchida(2019).Adaptive Test for Ergodic Diffusions Plus Noise, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol.203, 131-150.
61. Navarro, Codern, Guzman, Ortiz, Conejo, Gutiertez, Fente, Martella & Saracastti (2018). Integrating Curriculum-Based Dynamic Assessment in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Development and Predictive Validity of the EDPL-BAI Battery on Reading Competence, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.9(1492),1-30.
62. Ouweneel, Wilmar, Schaufeil & Blanc (2013).Believe, and You Will Achieve: Changes Over Time in Self-Efficacy, Engagement, and Performance, Applied Psychology: Health & Will-Being, Vol.5(2), 225-247.
63. Pandey, Levy, Serafini, Habibi & Loeb(2019).Self-Management Skills and Behaviors, Self-Efficacy, and Quality of Life in People with Eplepsy from Underserved Populations, Epliesy & Behaviour, Vol.98, 258-265.

64. Ponsoda(2018).Item Exposure Rate as Indicators of Test Security in CATs, Methodology, 12(1), 14-32.

65. Proceeding 10th Conference on Adaptive and Self-Adaptive Systems and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, February 18-22, 2018.

66. Proceeding The International Association for Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference,(IACAT), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 10-13, 2019.
67. Rachie & Peterson (2016).Computerized Adaptive Testing Generations, Journal of Statistical Software, Vol.58(3), 1-31.
68. Ramler, Buchgeher & Klammer (2018).Adaptive Automated Test Generation to GUI Testing of Industry Applications, Information and Software Technology, Vol.93, 248-263.
69. Revuelta (2016).Electronic Adaptive Test Administration Conditions, Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol.(31), 251-263.
70. Sauerwein, Pekaric, Feldere & Breu(2019). An Analysis and Classification of Public Information Security Data Sources Used in Research and Practice, Computers & security, Vol.82, 140-155.
71. Schwartz & Do (2016).Cost Effective Regression Testing through Adaptive Test Prioritization Strategies, Journal of Systems and Software, Vol.115, 61-81.
72. Simko, Barla & Kramar (2017). On the Impact of Adaptive Test Question Selection for learning Efficiency, Computers & Education, Vol.82, 238-340.
73. Smith & Adema(2019).Computer Adaptive Testing: The Impact of Test Characteristics on Percieved Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.87, 320-332.
74. Talsma, Schuz & Norris(2019). Miscalibration of Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance, Learning and Individual Differences, Vol.69, 182-195.
75. Tomasik, Berger & Moser (2018).On the Development of a Computer-Based Tool for Formative Student Assessment: Epistemological, Methodological, and Practical Issues, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.9(2245),1-30.
76. Tseng(2016).Measuring English Vocabulary Size Via Computerized Adaptive Testing, Computers & Education, Vol.97, 69-85.
77. Vanitha, Krishnan & Elakkia(2019).Collaborative Optimization Algorithm for Learning Path Construction in E-Learning, Computers & Electronical Engineering, Vo.77, 325-338.
78. Vie, Popineau, Bruillard & Bourda (2017).A Review of Recent Advances in Adaptive Assessment, Learning Analytic: A Fundaments, Applications and Trends, Vol.94, 1-31.
79. Wan & Niu(2018).An E-Learning Recommendation Approach Based on the Self-Organization of Learning Esource, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.160(15), 71-87.
80. Wang, Lin, Chang & Douglas(2016).Hybrid Computerized Adaptive Testing for Self-Efficacy, Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol.53(1), 45-62.
81. Weick & Wright (2018). Enhancing Self-Efficacy through the Management of Human Resources, Cambridge University Press, 380-404.
82. Xiaojuan (2017).Research and Implementation of Computer Data Security Management System, Procedia Engineering, Vol.174, 1371-1379.
83. Ying (2018).Multistage Computerized Adaptive Testing, Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.27(2), 211-222.
84. Zhang, Zhou, He & Xinsheng(2018).Adaptive Test for Mean Vectors of High-Dimensional Time Series Data with Factor Structure, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, Vol.47(4), 450-470.